If you believe this, then you probably have a lot of problems with the faster students who finish quickly and get bored. You've probably tried giving them extra activities, which they naturally resent because they don't see why they should have more work.
However, if we go in assuming that different students have different abilities, which change depending on their moods, and we designed lessons that catered to these strengths, maybe we wouldn't have to worry.
The secret is in differentiating the questions.
Let's focus on Reading and Listening lessons. Differentiated questions would look like this:
- For the slower students, the questions would be focussed on making sure they've understood the text. The response type would avoid asking for too much language, so for example they would underline or draw the answer which they would find directly from the text.
- For the higher level students, the questions would slowly climb up Bloom's Taxonomy which means that you could start with the assumption that they've understood the basic information and ask them to analyse, evaluate and create based on what they've heard or read.
On the negative side, this sounds like a lot of extra work for the teacher, but again, it depends on how it's done. I see teachers routinely asking their students to answer 12-15 questions. What if you only ask each student to answer 6 but have 12 choices ranging from easier to more difficult? It's not the quantity of questions, after all, but the quality.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario