To continue with the food analogy, here is an exerpt from a trainee journal followed by my response:
I heard some pretty
good assessment types from my classmates, but in the end, each one was shot
down by you and that was kind of frustrating.
I mean I understand WHY you do that and I would hate it if you didn't,
but I got the feeling of "So what the hell are we supposed to use then if
everything has a flaw?" I
understand the triangulation concept, but it just seems like it's so so so much
work, and with all the other crap that we as teachers have to do, I don't know
if there's time to do so much stuff! What if you think of it like food? There are SO many nutrients we’re supposed to
get every day, but on the other hand we can’t consume too many calories (this
was how I gained 20 pounds in my first trimester: I was determined not to have
any kind of nutritional deficiency!). On
top of that there are foods you just won’t eat because they’re too pricey or
you don’t like them or they’re not available…The point is to do the best you
can within the limitations you have. To
continue the analogy, I think easy-to-grade exams are kinda like French fries:
they’re good when you just need something fast.
Doing projects, on the other hand would be more like cooking Christmas
dinner: time-consuming, impossible to do every day, but well worth the extra
effort.
I got the analogy, but Christmas dinner is just once a year, so I can deal with one project a year.... Now I'm drumming my fingers on the table trying to figure out what to eat the rest of he year!
ResponderEliminar